Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:RfP)
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent disruptive editing and WP:COI. New editors continually remove controversial sections and replace them with positive but unsourced information. The article was protected two months ago for this reason but expired three weeks ago. Annh07 (talk) 04:44, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:08, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection: Requesting pending changes protection due to long-term persistent disruptive editing. RachelTensions (talk) 05:35, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aqurs1 (talk) 08:42, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aqurs1 (talk) 09:02, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked: 2-methylbutane is tasty (talk · contribs) blocked by EPIC. Locked, actually. Favonian (talk) 09:53, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Required Semi protect atleast for a month, Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP users and other registered editors — Preceding unsigned comment added by Musamar (talkcontribs) 09:11, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked: Jaamieupendra (talk · contribs).
    Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:39, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: High 'edit warring' activity. Other users involved are not cooperating and discussing on the talk page despite multiple requests to do so. Protection necessary for a while at least. ParvatPrakash (talk) 09:26, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    +1 Reason: High level of vandalism and Edit warring by probable sock puppet users already under investigation. Addition of unrealiable sourced content. Livingstonshr (talk) 09:28, 13 January 2025 (UTC) Livingstonshr (talk) 09:39, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The alternative would have been to block both of you for edit-warring. Favonian (talk) 10:19, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Full protection: Frequent removal of the page content Post-postmodernism is a neo-trend and it needs a special care. Few scholars are active in this field, and researchers who wish to do research in this field need to see the active scholars and publications. I suggest that all scholars who had been mentioned on the page are re-added and protected. Supporter33 (talk) 09:40, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 11:01, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. 💽 LunaEclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST) 11:02, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 11:06, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive edits. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 11:04, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 11:08, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


    Add “by June 30, 2024” to the sentence: The Lancet has estimated 70,000 deaths due to traumatic injuries.[8] Seahumidity (talk) 23:09, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Handled requests

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.